How to quote an interview in your master's thesis and protect the participant

You have a passage from an interview for your findings chapter, but a name, place or distinctive detail could give away who said it.

Published: Updated: About 5 minutes to read
A student reads an interview transcript with passages obscured, next to a voice recorder.
Reviewing a transcript before quoting a participant.

You have a passage from an interview for your findings chapter, but a name, place or distinctive detail could give away who said it. First, write down what the passage shows. Then mark every detail that could identify the person. Quote a shorter passage word for word if you can use it within the terms of your study without revealing the participant's identity. If someone could still recognise them, consider a paraphrase. Leave the passage out if that would still identify them.

What could give away who is speaking?

A full name identifies someone directly. A combination of ordinary details can do the same, such as the name of a small organisation, someone's role and the date of an event. Think about what colleagues and other participants already know. Check the details about people mentioned by the interviewee, too.

Warsaw University of Technology distinguishes between confidentiality and anonymity. You can know who a participant is and restrict access to information about them. If you keep a key linking the code W04 to their name, replacing the name with the code is called pseudonymisation. Adam Mickiewicz University's guide points out that a combination of details can identify someone even without that key. You still need to assess the passage itself.

From the raw interview to a quote in the findings

In this fictional sociology thesis, your research asks what makes it hard for volunteers to take regular shifts. The conversation, details and location below are invented.

Working transcript

Interviewer: What changed after your first few shifts?

Participant: I'm Nina Brzeskot, the only person who ran the late-night bicycle workshop on 17 May at the Splot Community Centre in Miedzina. I took shifts at first. Then I stopped because the rota came out too late for me to arrange childcare. I didn't ask anyone to change the date.

The sequence matters. The participant had been taking shifts, then found it hard to arrange childcare because the rota came out late. Her name identifies her directly. The venue, date and role together could identify her even after you remove her name. The finding can be presented without those details.

A direct quote using the original wording

If the childcare detail does not identify the participant when read alongside the rest of the thesis, you could write:

W04 linked her decision to stop taking shifts to the late release of the rota. “I took shifts at first. Then I stopped because the rota came out too late for me to arrange childcare.”

The example uses two consecutive sentences word for word. It shows how W04 explained her decision. In the next sentence, she says she did not ask anyone to change the date. The quote offers no evidence that the organiser turned down such a request.

A paraphrase when the childcare detail could identify the speaker

W04 initially took shifts but stopped when the late notice made it difficult to fit them around her caring responsibilities.

This is a paraphrase, so it has no quotation marks. It keeps the sequence and W04's reason while omitting the detail about the child. If the reference to caring responsibilities would identify her in this group, look for another passage about the issue. If removing the detail changes what she meant, leave the passage out or narrow your claim to what other interviews support.

How to explain the changes in your methods chapter

Explain what the interview code means, which details you removed or made more general, and how you distinguish quotes from paraphrases. Use the conventions for your degree programme. If you omit words from inside a quote or replace a name with a description, mark the change according to that convention and check that the passage still means the same thing. When substantial changes are needed, a paraphrase makes the distinction clearer. Keep working records and any code key in the protected location agreed for the study, separate from the version you plan to share.

Example methods paragraph. In the findings, interview contributions are identified by codes such as W04. Passages were selected to exclude details that could identify participants, including organisation names and dates of distinctive events. Quotation marks identify verbatim extracts. Where a detail could identify someone, the passage was paraphrased if its meaning could be preserved without revealing the participant's identity.

Check the passage against the whole thesis

  • Read the quote alongside the sample description, other quotes from the same person and the appendix. Details removed from one part may still appear elsewhere.
  • Compare the passage with the working transcript. Check who is speaking, what they are referring to and whether the shortened version keeps the original meaning.
  • Check how the study arrangements allow you to use the material, including any future access to the thesis. Talk to your supervisor if you are unsure whether the participant could be recognised.

If you also need to organise your transcripts and code the material, see How to analyse interviews for a thesis: from transcription to analysis.

What to prepare for a consultation on interviews

What should I send for the analysis of interviews in a sociology thesis?

Send anonymised transcripts, the interview guide, the aim and research questions, and a description of participant selection. Include the adopted analysis method and the supervisor's comments, if you have them. Based on this, I will determine the scope of organising themes, summarising statements, and editing the chapter.

Sources

  • Huras, P. (20 October 2023). Anonimowość i poufność badań społecznych. Strategic Analysis Department, Warsaw University of Technology.
  • Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań. Jak przygotować wniosek do Komisji Etyki ds. Projektów Badawczych? Poradnik. Chapter 6, Zbieranie danych w badaniach naukowych. Accessed 10 November 2026.

Discuss how to present interview material in your chapter

Tell us what your study is about, what your supervisor has said and what you are finding difficult. An invented example is enough to discuss the writing. Keep participant details and recordings in the location agreed for your study.

Thesis research section: methodology, results and discussionBachelor’s and master’s thesis proofreading and editing
Tell us about your chapter

Related articles

Before-and-after surveys for a nursing thesis - what can you calculate if responses cannot be linked?

After a class on patient education, you have two survey files for your nursing thesis. One is from before the class and the other from afterwards. After a class on patient education, you have two survey files for your nursing thesis. One is from before the class and the other from afterwards. If you have no way to link both answers from the same person, calculate the results for each time point separately. You can describe the difference between percentages, but the files cannot tell you whose answer changed. Start by checking who could complete each survey and whether the same code appears in both files. First step. Open the two original files and the survey forms. Check that the question, answer options and scoring key are the same. In a working summary, note how many participants answered at each time point and what makes it possible or impossible to link their answers. Teaching materials from Kielce University of Technology use a before-and-after measurement as an example of paired data when each person has two recorded values. In a school study, Agley and colleagues tested a way to match responses that had been planned before data collection. Even there, some forms could not be linked with confidence. You cannot apply those rules retrospectively if the information they rely on was never collected. In a fictional nursing thesis study, 40 students took part in a workshop on talking with a simulated patient. Before and immediately after the class, students received the same short question. They had to select the wording that asks a patient to explain an instruction in their own words. There were three options. “Is everything clear?”, “Do you have the instructions?” and “Could you tell me in your own words how you understand these instructions?” The last answer was correct at both time points. The class and results are fictional. In a Polish pilot study on communication with simulated patients, Bodys-Cupak and colleagues used questionnaires for the teacher, simulated patient and student, alongside checklists for the procedures performed. Our example counts answers to one question and does not...

Read article

How to design a research questionnaire without confusion or random questions

A research questionnaire should not be a collection of random questions. A good research instrument must follow from the thesis aim, research questions, hypotheses and variables. Learn how to prepare a questionnaire step by step so that it is easier to report the results in your research chapter later. See four survey introduction examples with participant instructions and checks of the form settings. For each question, note provisionally how you will present the answers. For single-choice questions, this may be the number of people and the percentage; for multiple-choice questions, the number of selections for each option; and for open questions, thematic categories along with a description of how they were created. Practise this on a small set of fictitious answers, clearly marked as a test. If a question about difficulties allows selecting several options, the sum of percentages of people may exceed 100%. If a question applies only to participants of consultations, percentages must be calculated for that group, not for everyone who fills in the questionnaire. Also record how missing data will be handled. No answer to the question “How many times did you use consultations?” does not mean zero consultations. Meanwhile, “I do not remember” is a provided answer with a different meaning than an empty field. If you plan to compare groups, ensure that you have a variable allowing you to identify them. If you want to calculate a composite score from several items, establish the justification for such a combination and the scoring rules in advance. Do not sum random questions just because each has answers marked with numbers from 1 to 5. We described the next stage in the guide on processing research results, percentages and comments on the questionnaire. It is worth looking at it before the study to check whether the designed questions will provide the data needed in the empirical chapter. Are you planning group comparisons or tests of associations and unsure what data you will need? Before distributing the questionnaire, you can discuss with me selecting statistical analyses for research questions. I will help determine whether the answers will allow...

Read article